Skip to main content

Will Microsoft's Hyper-V eventually drive ESX to go open source?

I think open sourcing might be too much to ask (not that it won't happen eventually), what will certainly happen is that ESX will be shipped free on the hardware that you'll buy. I envisioned several versions of ESX sometime back, I think back in 2006 already and divided them into several categories, this is however the revised product development, segregation and segmentation strategy:

  • Buying mobile devices?: Product: ESXembed comes free with your PDA, phone, blackberry etc. Using it to run several applications simultaneously with it. Benefits of such containarization of tasks are endless.
  • Buying Laptops?: Product: ESXlite comes free with it. Benefit: Run Mac, Windows, Linux at near-native speeds, side by side. I have been desperately waiting for this.
  • Buying Servers: Product: ESXEnterprise etc: All coming free with your boxes. Well they already thought it out and called it 3i
  • Buying Cloud Ready Data Center sets?: Product: ESXGrid Version comes free with the grid of commodity boxes. Do the google yourself now!
  • Buying HPC for your home innovations? Things like developing alternative fuels, doing all the things that we all have been desperately waiting for, will finally come from the community. Product: ESXtreme
They all will come free and the revenue model will move onto services.

Anyways we were talking about Hyper-V tests by this tester:

Even though Hyper-V is still pre-1.0 code, I think Microsoft has done a bang-up job with its hypervisor, and it may just turn this Linux freak into a Windows 2008 junkie for running his own personal virtualization needs. While VMWare’s ESX is still superior on a number of fronts, including its aforementioned VMotion technology and its more powerful cluster management tools, Microsoft has certainly sent a major warning shot across its bow and the bows of the respective Linux vendors, as well.

If I were VMWare, I’d seriously look into open sourcing my hypervisor, engaging the community to get it entrenched into every environment possible – not just the Fortune 100 who have thousands of dollars per server to blow on a virtualization solution — and focusing my efforts on support and value-add. Hyper-V represents the first stage of the mass-commodization of hypervisor technology, and if this beta release is any indication, it’s going to be a rough ride ahead for Microsoft’s competitors. In fact, Hyper-V may be Server 2008’s “killer app” that the analysts have been looking for all this time.



ZDnet does not usually cover relevant news but this time they still ended up doing the same ;-). I quoted them on what I think is more important to VMware's future, erroneous reporting really doesn't matter as we all know that ZDnet can never state facts or check them before publishing.
Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousSat Feb 16, 12:52:00 AM GMT+1

    The ZDnet Article is full of many factual errors.

    It claims that VMware ESX does not support SATA...wrong. 3.5 does.

    It claims that VMware is a closed system thus slowing development....wrong. Are you kidding? VMware is constantly raising the bar and setting the standard for new features in the virtualization space. Example: First to deliver virtual SMP, live migration, dynamic load balancing, automatic VM restart after host failures, thin hypervisors....I could go on and on. Also a perfect example of innovation by the community is the Infiniband support in 3.5. It was developed by members of the VMware Community Source Program.

    The article claims that VMware's ESX server HCL is small while MS and Xen do not have that problem....WRONG. MS Hyper-V and Xen have HCL's (http://download.microsoft.com/download/e/4/8/e48d5cff-53d2-4eed-85bf-4af50e25b78c/relnotes.htm#ESB and http://hcl.xensource.com/). In fact, the MS and Xen HCL's are much more limited than the VMware HCL. Hyper-V has only been test on 8 servers. Citrix has only tested Xen on 45 servers. In contrast, VMware has over 400 servers on the ESX Server 3.0.2 HCL

    The article claims that ESX REQUIRES expensive shared storage....WRONG. ESX provides 4 options for storage: Fiber Channel, iSCSI, NFS and local.

    The article claimes that ESX is a "pure software based virtualization"...WRONG. For the bulk of x86 CPU instructions, ESX does direct execution on the physical CPU. VMware has used binary translation primarily because the current generation of hardware assists provided by AMD and Intel are actually SLOWER. VMware is working closley with AMD and Intel to ensure their next generation CPU's provide better hardware-assist.

    Of course the ZDNET author admits many of these facts in the comments section, but has yet to issue a correction.

    I thought you would appreciate the note.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus
Post a Comment
Read more

Splunk that!

Saw this advert on Slashdot and went on to look for it and found the tour pretty neat to look at. Check out the demo too! So why would I need it? WHY NOT? I'd say. As an organization grows , new services, new data comes by, new logs start accumulating on the servers and it becomes increasingly difficult to look at all those logs, leave alone that you'd have time to read them and who cares about analysis as the time to look for those log files already makes your day, isn't it? Well a solution like this is a cool option to have your sysadmins/operators look at ONE PLACE and thus you don't have your administrators lurking around in your physical servers and *accidentally* messing up things there. Go ahead and give it a shot by downloading it and testing it. I'll give it a shot myself! Ok so I went ahead and installed it. Do this... [root@tarrydev Software]# ./splunk-Server-1.0.1-linux-installer.bin to install and this (if you screw up) [root@tarrydev Software]# /op
Post a Comment
Read more

Virtualization is hot and sexy!

If this does not convince you to virtualize, believe me, nothing will :-) As you will hear these gorgeous women mention VMware, Akkori, Pano Logic, Microsoft and VKernel. They forgot to mention rackspace ;-) virtualization girl video I'm convinced, aren't you? Check out their site as well!
Post a Comment
Read more