Skip to main content

Will Microsoft's Hyper-V eventually drive ESX to go open source?

I think open sourcing might be too much to ask (not that it won't happen eventually), what will certainly happen is that ESX will be shipped free on the hardware that you'll buy. I envisioned several versions of ESX sometime back, I think back in 2006 already and divided them into several categories, this is however the revised product development, segregation and segmentation strategy:

  • Buying mobile devices?: Product: ESXembed comes free with your PDA, phone, blackberry etc. Using it to run several applications simultaneously with it. Benefits of such containarization of tasks are endless.
  • Buying Laptops?: Product: ESXlite comes free with it. Benefit: Run Mac, Windows, Linux at near-native speeds, side by side. I have been desperately waiting for this.
  • Buying Servers: Product: ESXEnterprise etc: All coming free with your boxes. Well they already thought it out and called it 3i
  • Buying Cloud Ready Data Center sets?: Product: ESXGrid Version comes free with the grid of commodity boxes. Do the google yourself now!
  • Buying HPC for your home innovations? Things like developing alternative fuels, doing all the things that we all have been desperately waiting for, will finally come from the community. Product: ESXtreme
They all will come free and the revenue model will move onto services.

Anyways we were talking about Hyper-V tests by this tester:

Even though Hyper-V is still pre-1.0 code, I think Microsoft has done a bang-up job with its hypervisor, and it may just turn this Linux freak into a Windows 2008 junkie for running his own personal virtualization needs. While VMWare’s ESX is still superior on a number of fronts, including its aforementioned VMotion technology and its more powerful cluster management tools, Microsoft has certainly sent a major warning shot across its bow and the bows of the respective Linux vendors, as well.

If I were VMWare, I’d seriously look into open sourcing my hypervisor, engaging the community to get it entrenched into every environment possible – not just the Fortune 100 who have thousands of dollars per server to blow on a virtualization solution — and focusing my efforts on support and value-add. Hyper-V represents the first stage of the mass-commodization of hypervisor technology, and if this beta release is any indication, it’s going to be a rough ride ahead for Microsoft’s competitors. In fact, Hyper-V may be Server 2008’s “killer app” that the analysts have been looking for all this time.

ZDnet does not usually cover relevant news but this time they still ended up doing the same ;-). I quoted them on what I think is more important to VMware's future, erroneous reporting really doesn't matter as we all know that ZDnet can never state facts or check them before publishing.


  1. The ZDnet Article is full of many factual errors.

    It claims that VMware ESX does not support SATA...wrong. 3.5 does.

    It claims that VMware is a closed system thus slowing development....wrong. Are you kidding? VMware is constantly raising the bar and setting the standard for new features in the virtualization space. Example: First to deliver virtual SMP, live migration, dynamic load balancing, automatic VM restart after host failures, thin hypervisors....I could go on and on. Also a perfect example of innovation by the community is the Infiniband support in 3.5. It was developed by members of the VMware Community Source Program.

    The article claims that VMware's ESX server HCL is small while MS and Xen do not have that problem....WRONG. MS Hyper-V and Xen have HCL's ( and In fact, the MS and Xen HCL's are much more limited than the VMware HCL. Hyper-V has only been test on 8 servers. Citrix has only tested Xen on 45 servers. In contrast, VMware has over 400 servers on the ESX Server 3.0.2 HCL

    The article claims that ESX REQUIRES expensive shared storage....WRONG. ESX provides 4 options for storage: Fiber Channel, iSCSI, NFS and local.

    The article claimes that ESX is a "pure software based virtualization"...WRONG. For the bulk of x86 CPU instructions, ESX does direct execution on the physical CPU. VMware has used binary translation primarily because the current generation of hardware assists provided by AMD and Intel are actually SLOWER. VMware is working closley with AMD and Intel to ensure their next generation CPU's provide better hardware-assist.

    Of course the ZDNET author admits many of these facts in the comments section, but has yet to issue a correction.

    I thought you would appreciate the note.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DeepLearningTrucker Part 1

Avastu Blog is migrating to; 1st Jan 2009 live


I will send out emails personally to those who are using my link(s) on their sites.

Thanks much for your co-operation and hope you enjoy the new site and its cool new features :-)

Not like the site is unlive or something..on the contrary, its beginning to get a lot of attention already. Well most of the work is done, you don't have to worry about anything though:

What won't change

Links/Referrals: I will be redirecting the links (all links which you may have cross-posted) to - so you don't have to do anything in all your posts and links. Although, I would urge however that you do change the permalinks, especially on your blogs etc yourselfThis blog is not going away anywhere but within a few months, I will consider discontinuing its usage. I won't obviously do …

Cloud Security: Eliminate humans from the "Information Supply Chain on the Web"

My upcoming article, part - 3 data center predictions for 2009, has a slideshot talking about the transition from the current age to the cloud computing age to eventually the ideation age- the age where you will have clouds that will emote but they will have no internal employees.

Biggest management disasters occur because internal folks are making a mess of the playground.

Om's blog is carrying an article about Cloud security and it is rather direct but also makes a lot of sense:

I don’t believe that clouds themselves will cause the security breaches and data theft they anticipate; in many ways, clouds will result in better security. Here’s why: Fewer humans –Most computer breaches are the result of human error; only 20-40 percent stem from technical malfunctions. Cloud operators that want to be profitable take humans out of the loop whenever possible.Better tools – Clouds can afford high-end data protection and security monitoring tools, as well as the experts to run them. I trust…