Skip to main content

Will Microsoft's Hyper-V eventually drive ESX to go open source?

I think open sourcing might be too much to ask (not that it won't happen eventually), what will certainly happen is that ESX will be shipped free on the hardware that you'll buy. I envisioned several versions of ESX sometime back, I think back in 2006 already and divided them into several categories, this is however the revised product development, segregation and segmentation strategy:

  • Buying mobile devices?: Product: ESXembed comes free with your PDA, phone, blackberry etc. Using it to run several applications simultaneously with it. Benefits of such containarization of tasks are endless.
  • Buying Laptops?: Product: ESXlite comes free with it. Benefit: Run Mac, Windows, Linux at near-native speeds, side by side. I have been desperately waiting for this.
  • Buying Servers: Product: ESXEnterprise etc: All coming free with your boxes. Well they already thought it out and called it 3i
  • Buying Cloud Ready Data Center sets?: Product: ESXGrid Version comes free with the grid of commodity boxes. Do the google yourself now!
  • Buying HPC for your home innovations? Things like developing alternative fuels, doing all the things that we all have been desperately waiting for, will finally come from the community. Product: ESXtreme
They all will come free and the revenue model will move onto services.

Anyways we were talking about Hyper-V tests by this tester:

Even though Hyper-V is still pre-1.0 code, I think Microsoft has done a bang-up job with its hypervisor, and it may just turn this Linux freak into a Windows 2008 junkie for running his own personal virtualization needs. While VMWare’s ESX is still superior on a number of fronts, including its aforementioned VMotion technology and its more powerful cluster management tools, Microsoft has certainly sent a major warning shot across its bow and the bows of the respective Linux vendors, as well.

If I were VMWare, I’d seriously look into open sourcing my hypervisor, engaging the community to get it entrenched into every environment possible – not just the Fortune 100 who have thousands of dollars per server to blow on a virtualization solution — and focusing my efforts on support and value-add. Hyper-V represents the first stage of the mass-commodization of hypervisor technology, and if this beta release is any indication, it’s going to be a rough ride ahead for Microsoft’s competitors. In fact, Hyper-V may be Server 2008’s “killer app” that the analysts have been looking for all this time.



ZDnet does not usually cover relevant news but this time they still ended up doing the same ;-). I quoted them on what I think is more important to VMware's future, erroneous reporting really doesn't matter as we all know that ZDnet can never state facts or check them before publishing.
Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousSat Feb 16, 12:52:00 AM GMT+1

    The ZDnet Article is full of many factual errors.

    It claims that VMware ESX does not support SATA...wrong. 3.5 does.

    It claims that VMware is a closed system thus slowing development....wrong. Are you kidding? VMware is constantly raising the bar and setting the standard for new features in the virtualization space. Example: First to deliver virtual SMP, live migration, dynamic load balancing, automatic VM restart after host failures, thin hypervisors....I could go on and on. Also a perfect example of innovation by the community is the Infiniband support in 3.5. It was developed by members of the VMware Community Source Program.

    The article claims that VMware's ESX server HCL is small while MS and Xen do not have that problem....WRONG. MS Hyper-V and Xen have HCL's (http://download.microsoft.com/download/e/4/8/e48d5cff-53d2-4eed-85bf-4af50e25b78c/relnotes.htm#ESB and http://hcl.xensource.com/). In fact, the MS and Xen HCL's are much more limited than the VMware HCL. Hyper-V has only been test on 8 servers. Citrix has only tested Xen on 45 servers. In contrast, VMware has over 400 servers on the ESX Server 3.0.2 HCL

    The article claims that ESX REQUIRES expensive shared storage....WRONG. ESX provides 4 options for storage: Fiber Channel, iSCSI, NFS and local.

    The article claimes that ESX is a "pure software based virtualization"...WRONG. For the bulk of x86 CPU instructions, ESX does direct execution on the physical CPU. VMware has used binary translation primarily because the current generation of hardware assists provided by AMD and Intel are actually SLOWER. VMware is working closley with AMD and Intel to ensure their next generation CPU's provide better hardware-assist.

    Of course the ZDNET author admits many of these facts in the comments section, but has yet to issue a correction.

    I thought you would appreciate the note.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus
Post a Comment
Read more

Virtualization: GlassHouse hopes to cash in with its IPO!

GlassHouse Technologies Inc. on Tuesday registered to raise as much as $100 million in an initial public offering that, despite the company's financial losses, could prove a hit with investors drawn to its focus on "virtualization" technology. The Framingham, Mass., company offers consulting services for companies that use virtualization software to improve the performance of corporate servers and cut costs in their data centers. GlassHouse also provides Internet-based data storage. "Software-as-a-service," or SaaS, companies and vendors of virtualization products have proved popular among investors in recent years as corporate customers seek alternatives to conventional packaged software. GlassHouse, with roots in both sectors, will test the strength of that interest, said Peter Falvey, managing director with Boston investment bank Revolution Partners. "It will be a bit of a bell weather," he says. "It's not as though it's the 15th SaaS m...
Post a Comment
Read more