Skip to main content

Consolidation and Virtualization top Data Center strategies

Like intel is on its massive 130 data center consolidation and virtualization spree, and it might take them 8 or so years, to get there. Many other data centers, large and small, ought to realize that this is a massive undertaking. Don't lose focus and make sure that you are ready for the next phase while you are half-way down the line, doing this consolidation and virtualization:
  • Staffing: You need to shuffle, train and hire some "Virtualization Aware" with strong business- and customer facing capabilities. Just start talking to your HR already to make sure you have agile staff to manage you highly agile, but also at the same time, vulnerable virtual data center.
  • Security: I sure hope for you, that you are doing this right from day one. If not go ahead and look for vendors that can provide you that. Check out Bluelane, Reflex Security, Catbird and several others (that I may have missed out here), even consult your virtualization vendors (VMware, Citrix, Microsoft) for their advice.
  • Are you current processes , ITIL, ITSM, Change Management, CMDB, Provisioning, SLA, etc , all aligned to go through this transformation?
  • Did you consider DRP? Please do that as well from day 1!
This is by no means a complete list, but a mere reminder, that you are just getting started with this thing, a lot has to happen before you can look back and heave a sigh of relief. I am sorry but that's the way it is :-|

The report, based on surveys of datacentre managers in 14 countries including the UK by Ziff Davis Enterprise, said Global 2000 enterprises were spending more than £3.2bn annually to help manage datacentre complexity.

The report said server virtualisation and consolidation were considered top cost containment strategies for the majority of respondents, with half implementing virtualisation strategies and 58% implementing consolidation strategies.



Link
Labels:

Comments

  1. UnknownWed Oct 31, 03:20:00 PM GMT+1

    We agree IT managers need to build their virtualization security plans in at the inception. But don't leave Catbird off of the top vendor list. We have the industry's only comprehensive hypervisor protection, Guest OS security, policy monitoring enforcement and server sprawl management solution.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tarry SinghWed Oct 31, 03:48:00 PM GMT+1

    Then why aren't you on my radar? ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  3. UnknownWed Oct 31, 04:15:00 PM GMT+1

    you haven't been going to the right parties.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Tarry SinghWed Oct 31, 07:02:00 PM GMT+1

    The "parties" take an effort to come within the vicinity of "the radar" :-)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus
Post a Comment
Read more

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...
Post a Comment
Read more