Skip to main content

VMware attempts to clarify security confusion as PCI DSS 1.2 leaves VI out

Alex reporting:

The company has also launched the VMware Compliance Center, a website dedicated to educating merchants and auditors about compliance in a virtualized environments, and the resource includes links to relevant white papers and webcasts.

With its entrance into PCI SSC, VMware hopes to address confusion about whether virtual environments comply with existing standards for data security.
"Right now, from an audit perspective, there is confusion around if someone wants to use virtualization, if it can be used in a PCI-compliant environment," said Bill Hau, the vice president of Foundstone Professional Services, a division of security vendor McAfee.

Bringing PCI DSS into the virtual world
Founded by a core group of credit card merchants, including American Express, Discover, JCB International, MasterCard, and Visa, PCI SSC developed the PCI Data Security Standard (PCI DSS), which is a set of guidelines that participating merchants must follow to safeguard credit card data. As part of that group, VMware's plan "is to show how certain regulations might need to be adapted to take advantage of virtualization," said Shekar Ayyar, VMware vice president of infrastructure alliances.


Source

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...