Skip to main content

VMware launches "Compliance Center"!

As regulatory compliance expands, more and more of your virtual environment will become subject to security and compliance standards, such as PCI DSS, HIPAA and SOX (GLBA). With the proper tools, achieving and demonstrating compliance on VMware Infrastructure is not only possible, but can often become easier than a non-virtual environment.

Assess the Management Control Features in a Virtual Platform

Having a secure foundation is the first step. As security threats grow and evolve, your security environment will need to be flexible and adaptable. Security standards require enterprise-grade management features in order to provide the necessary controls for achieving and demonstrating compliance. The following describes the management features that a virtual computing platform should have in order to be compliance-ready.

Start by Looking at Authentication and Authorization Capabilities

Security management starts with authentication and authorization. All virtual platform interfaces to the outside world must have authentication control as well as the ability to grant fine-grained access privileges via a flexible authorization framework. You should be able to limit the scope of these permissions to specific objects or parts of the infrastructure and grant the right access rights to the right people, without violating the principle of “least privilege.” In addition, privileges for administering virtual machines must be distinct from those for administering the hosts, as a means of limiting the scope of application owners. This critical “separation of duties” (SoD) limits the scope of possible abuse by “insiders,” such as data theft by system administrators or malicious or negligent system change by data owners.

Make Sure you Have Central Access to Configuration and Logging Parameters

To simplify platform configurations, parameters should be kept in a few, well-known locations with standard or easy-to-read formats. These configuration parameters should only be accessed and modified by those authorized to do so. In addition, there should be central access to detailed event logs for your virtual platform components and related management tools for review, analysis and controlled log retention.

Insist Upon a Single, Flexible and Well-Defined API

The virtualization platform must have a well-defined and open API to capture and view inventory, including topology. The API must also be able to control various functions and to securely extract audit data like the earlier mentioned activity logs. In addition, a well-architected system would not involve multiple, parallel API sets that are each used for different purposes—for example, one for internal components and a similar but distinct one for external integration. Having one API provides a “single source of truth,” so you can be confident that all interactions can be controlled and monitored in a reliable and consistent manner. An API with these characteristics will make satisfying regulatory compliance requirements much easier.



VMware

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...