Skip to main content

Platespin ships PowerConvert 7.0!

This webinar will discuss how PlateSpin’s first major product release since the company was acquired by Novell can improve the speed and quality of your data center initiatives including server consolidation, hardware lease migration, data center relocation and disaster recovery. With extended support for Linux and Windows-based server workloads, new image-based disaster recovery capabilities and migration speed enhancements geared toward reliable, risk-free enterprise implementations, PowerConvert 7.0 is a best-in-class solution for migrating, protecting and optimizing server workloads across multiple physical and virtual platforms.


Discussion Topics

- A checklist of what to look for in an enterprise-ready workload migration solution
- Strategies for reducing overall project times and business risk for large-scale migrations
- New features and performance enhancements in PowerConvert 7.0
- How PowerConvert 7.0 enables large-scale, enterprise data center initiatives
- Extending backup and recovery functions with full, incremental and differential images
- How to achieve savings in staffing time, bandwidth and storage costs in the data center

Register to this webinar!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus
Post a Comment
Read more

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...
Post a Comment
Read more