Skip to main content

Thinsy Corporation Announces LiveSync support for Oracle VM Server 2.1.1


LiveSync Peer-To-Peer storage technology enables Enterprise Grade
features such as High Availability Backup VM Server with Automatic
Failover and Live Migration.
The EnSpeed LiveSync technology is also compatible with other standard
Linux distributions such as RedHat 5.1 and CentOS 5.1. LiveSync is also
included in EnSpeed VMM with LiveSync, stand-alone VM Server software
that installs on bare metal.

In addition, Thinsy Corporation also announced the availability of a new
version of EnSpeed VM Orchestrator, their VM Management Server that
provides an intuitive web browser GUI for managing LiveSync VM Servers.
This new version of EnSpeed VM Orchestrator has been enhanced with
support for Cloned VMs and full SSL secured connections.

For additional information on EnSpeed VMM with LiveSync, please visit
http://www.thinsy.com/ . Free downloads of the fully functional LiveSync
rpm for Oracle VM Server 2.1.1 and RedHat 5.1, EnSpeed VMM with
LiveSync, and EnSpeed VM Orchestrator are available immediately at the
Thinsy Corporation website http://www.thinsy.com/.


Link
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus
Post a Comment
Read more

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...
Post a Comment
Read more