Skip to main content

Attune Systems Announces eDiscovery and Archive Solution Based on its File Management Technology

The Maestro Intelligent Archive Manager enables customers to build large-scale file archives based on industry-standard storage systems. Single-instance file storage avoids storing duplicate files, thus significantly decreasing the footprint of the archive Maestro Intelligent Archive Manager is based on Attune’s leading file virtualization technology, allowing storage administrators, legal and compliance teams to view the archive via different views, such as by server, date or file owner.

“The Maestro Intelligent Archive Manager will be a great solution for customers, allowing them to easily take advantage of file-based virtualization in existing Windows environments,” said Kevin Haynes, Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP), and former technology security manager at City of Jacksonville. “There is no additional load on the network. Searches are performed on the Maestro archive, so there is no need to access back-end storage, avoiding an extra load on the production storage or network. Users and network administrators will be able to access virtual folders containing archives, and the provided calendar or server views will help users easily locate what they need, with complete integration with the native Windows security model.”


Press
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus
Post a Comment
Read more

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...
Post a Comment
Read more