Skip to main content

AppStream selects LWP to expand in Europe

“Building strong relationships with leading distributors such as LWP is key to our growing business,” said Nic Burkinshaw, sales operation manager - EMEA, AppStream. “Global and pan-European enterprises look to trusted advisors in the technical VAR and VAD community to identify, evaluate and manage emerging technologies like AppStream in support of their IT operations. We are confident that LWP will help us to provide value to the specific needs of the customers in their partner community.”

AppStream’s award-winning streaming technology allows any Windows-based software application to be streamed on-demand to an end-user’s desktop in LAN, WAN or home worker environments, and includes a full complement of user-based application provisioning and license management tools. AppStream can be deployed standalone or in tandem with existing enterprise software deployment systems. AppStream also supports application virtualisation packages from leading vendors, adding the unique on-demand, user-based distribution component to complete emerging virtualization solutions. LWP’s distribution and knowledge-based technology expertise can help supply components for the development of this powerful solution for centralized application management to their established partner base throughout the DACH region.


Press release here
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus
Post a Comment
Read more

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...
Post a Comment
Read more