Skip to main content

VMware should have begun with a hefty pricing model

This is totally another perspective and somehow I can kind of agree with Michael here. Many firms would be dying to get this software that dramatically saves their costs. More like what Oracle RAC does, it is a unique technology and they continue to charge a lot for it. Customers who do need RAC will go for RAC. But what Michael is forgetting is that VMware is not only watching the ceiling, it is watching the floor as well. Having priced heavily would have had ramifications of totally different dimensions.

Let me explain it this way. 2000 bust was a real bust. A lot of disastrous scenarios unfolded. we are into recession, we do need to consolidate and VMware is not on the ceiling. so coming back to the discussion, I think that ESX server is priced right. It is not too heavy and it is not dirt cheap.

SMBs who are looking for creative solutions can hook up with Dell, with its new EqualLogic and get that iSCSI going. They can buy Virtual Iron or Citrix's virtualization and can move on from there as they scale.

VMware is moving unperturbed in its domains (Fortune 100, -500, -1000). I am sure thet Q4 earnings will not be disappointing.

Anyways here's the other perspective:

Today, as a VAC, “The worst ROI I’ve ever seen was for a customer with just 14 servers that needed to buy a new SAN [storage area network]. They saw ROI in less than a year and saved $180,000 over three years,” he said. “That’s still pretty compelling in my book.” Shops with more servers and a pre-existing SAN tend to see dramatically better numbers.

But setting its pricing so low was “a mistake” on VMware’s part, Tharp argued. “It gave them no wiggle room” a situation that manifests today as a “reluctance to negotiate any kind of discount.”

Ah..hindsight is hihdsight. When I do consulting I leave all options open: Citrix, Sun, VMware, Virtual Iron. Whatever you want, the engineers can make it all work.

Here's Alex's post.


Popular posts from this blog

DeepLearningTrucker Part 1

Avastu Blog is migrating to; 1st Jan 2009 live


I will send out emails personally to those who are using my link(s) on their sites.

Thanks much for your co-operation and hope you enjoy the new site and its cool new features :-)

Not like the site is unlive or something..on the contrary, its beginning to get a lot of attention already. Well most of the work is done, you don't have to worry about anything though:

What won't change

Links/Referrals: I will be redirecting the links (all links which you may have cross-posted) to - so you don't have to do anything in all your posts and links. Although, I would urge however that you do change the permalinks, especially on your blogs etc yourselfThis blog is not going away anywhere but within a few months, I will consider discontinuing its usage. I won't obviously do …

Cloud Security: Eliminate humans from the "Information Supply Chain on the Web"

My upcoming article, part - 3 data center predictions for 2009, has a slideshot talking about the transition from the current age to the cloud computing age to eventually the ideation age- the age where you will have clouds that will emote but they will have no internal employees.

Biggest management disasters occur because internal folks are making a mess of the playground.

Om's blog is carrying an article about Cloud security and it is rather direct but also makes a lot of sense:

I don’t believe that clouds themselves will cause the security breaches and data theft they anticipate; in many ways, clouds will result in better security. Here’s why: Fewer humans –Most computer breaches are the result of human error; only 20-40 percent stem from technical malfunctions. Cloud operators that want to be profitable take humans out of the loop whenever possible.Better tools – Clouds can afford high-end data protection and security monitoring tools, as well as the experts to run them. I trust…