Skip to main content

Storage for SMB: Multi-part series

Quoting SearchStorage:

Dr Kevin McIsaac of Australian analyst firm IBRS research is one of those sceptical of storage virtualisation. Even once you manage to pin down a definition - which is something the industry struggles with, he says - it doesn't amount to much.

According to McIsaac, the type of storage virtualisation that vendors tout tends to be a layer at the host or at the network that allows storage from different vendors to talk to one another, pooling many disparate physical disk drives into one abstract body of storage.

"So you've got an EMC device and you've got a something else over there, and we'll put this bit of 'magic pixie dust' over the top of it and it will all look the same and it'll be easy to manage and improve utilisation."

But don't believe the hype, he says:

"Like I'll believe that. I'm very negative about storage virtualisation."


Link
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus
Post a Comment
Read more

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...
Post a Comment
Read more