Skip to main content

VMware pricing continues to frustrate the industry

Some important questions before entering 2008:

  • Is VMware taking too many things for granted of its first movers role?
  • Will that work for VMware in this fast age of aspirational computing and rising consumerism?
  • Did it really help Oracle "eventually"? I mean Microsoft's SQL Server has grown since its version 1.0 to a very robust solution, going to SQL 2008 CTP version which you can download today?
  • What about the vendors like Virtual Iron, XenSource and other offerings? Why sign those 2 year ELAs when you do have parties that do just about what needs to be done?
  • What else do the clients/customers expect in the next two years? Heck analysts are too struggling to figure out and making all kinds of balderdash predictive work.
  • What about the complementers? (I have seen and heard enough complementers who are not really happy with the way things are going. Sorry I am not at a liberty to name any one of them)
I don't think that people should just focus on the cost, there are also other issues that may not help VMware in this new age. We are indeed not in the 90s. But if people do want do the 90s comparison then I am afraid that we may see another Netscape story.

To be fair to the innovation: I still think that we also need to look at this product. We would never have had VMware in the spotlight if some firms were seriously working to deliver a product that could reach across all depths and breadths. Vmware managed to do that.

Cost is not the only thing here.

Anyways here's Alex's psot that triggered this blog reaction:

Part of that may be VMware's relative newness to the enterprise software game. After going through the ELA negotiating process with VMware, "I got the impression that they haven't written too many of these things," he said, citing difficulties with seemingly simple problems, like getting existing "onesie, twosie" licenses the firm had purchased to expire co-terminously. "It's been a struggle to get them to do this." The way VMware models its direct sales organization is another bone of contention. Unlike other large vendors like Hewlett-Packard Co. and EMC Corp., which provide the source with a single representative for the entire company, multiple VMware reps all serve this company, assigned according to geography, and fight one another for the company's business.

"I just want a single point of contact at VMware," he said plaintively.

With the lack of mature virtualization alternatives on the market, the source said he is comfortable signing a two-year ELA, but no longer. In the next three or four years, other players may emerge with credible enterprise stories. "As soon as the critical point hits, people are going to switch [to other virtualization vendors] if they continue treating people this way."



Popular posts from this blog

DeepLearningTrucker Part 1

Avastu Blog is migrating to; 1st Jan 2009 live


I will send out emails personally to those who are using my link(s) on their sites.

Thanks much for your co-operation and hope you enjoy the new site and its cool new features :-)

Not like the site is unlive or something..on the contrary, its beginning to get a lot of attention already. Well most of the work is done, you don't have to worry about anything though:

What won't change

Links/Referrals: I will be redirecting the links (all links which you may have cross-posted) to - so you don't have to do anything in all your posts and links. Although, I would urge however that you do change the permalinks, especially on your blogs etc yourselfThis blog is not going away anywhere but within a few months, I will consider discontinuing its usage. I won't obviously do …

Cloud Security: Eliminate humans from the "Information Supply Chain on the Web"

My upcoming article, part - 3 data center predictions for 2009, has a slideshot talking about the transition from the current age to the cloud computing age to eventually the ideation age- the age where you will have clouds that will emote but they will have no internal employees.

Biggest management disasters occur because internal folks are making a mess of the playground.

Om's blog is carrying an article about Cloud security and it is rather direct but also makes a lot of sense:

I don’t believe that clouds themselves will cause the security breaches and data theft they anticipate; in many ways, clouds will result in better security. Here’s why: Fewer humans –Most computer breaches are the result of human error; only 20-40 percent stem from technical malfunctions. Cloud operators that want to be profitable take humans out of the loop whenever possible.Better tools – Clouds can afford high-end data protection and security monitoring tools, as well as the experts to run them. I trust…