Skip to main content

Forbes 25 Web Celebs: Do you want to be a Celeb or a pro blogger?

Forbes recently announced its best chosen Web Celebs for 2007. But be warned not every area they operate on is what it will be. Value-add is a totally different story and viewership is another story altogether.

For instance this top blogger, clicks photos and is a gossip-mongrel ;-), and his viewership could be a layer that may not have any significant impact on the US economy. But hey, we want gossip news, right?

"[PerezHilton.com] has a really loyal fan base," says Heather Dougherty, director of research for Internet measurement company Hitwise. Ninety-one percent of Hilton's traffic is returning visitors. Those readers also include key demographics: 73% of the readers are women, and 71% are under the age of 35. Hitwise tracks 17 sites that fall into the category of celebrity news, says Dougherty, and in that category, Perez has 46% of the market share. His biggest competitor, Egotastic, has only 8%.


Some, however, have good stuff to tell. I like Mike's and Om's blogs, although lately they are not really that fun to read anymore as they just carry news! So where is the v alue-add, sure they are growing and are getting popular, and I'm sure all those adverts are fetching them dollars.

But most of the bloggers in the list are "Rant Drag Queens", an employee who obviously didn't say good stuff about her employer , gets fired, gets a blog. So she gets viewership and she has her business. Same applies to the fake steve, the Forbes guy.

I know, you really get warm feeling to see all those thousands of lost souls waking up early in the morning and reading if brad pitt was filmed naked, but which world are we talking about. This is just a new platform, paper-less gossip media.

Don't get me wrong here, I am sure that they are really "on to something", they really are. They have a mission, all of them. And there are a few out in that list who are into professional blogging, its just that I fear that they are attracting the a different kind of audience.

What kind of blogger are you: Real or a media-slut?

Forbe's list here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus

Splunk that!

Saw this advert on Slashdot and went on to look for it and found the tour pretty neat to look at. Check out the demo too! So why would I need it? WHY NOT? I'd say. As an organization grows , new services, new data comes by, new logs start accumulating on the servers and it becomes increasingly difficult to look at all those logs, leave alone that you'd have time to read them and who cares about analysis as the time to look for those log files already makes your day, isn't it? Well a solution like this is a cool option to have your sysadmins/operators look at ONE PLACE and thus you don't have your administrators lurking around in your physical servers and *accidentally* messing up things there. Go ahead and give it a shot by downloading it and testing it. I'll give it a shot myself! Ok so I went ahead and installed it. Do this... [root@tarrydev Software]# ./splunk-Server-1.0.1-linux-installer.bin to install and this (if you screw up) [root@tarrydev Software]# /op