Skip to main content

Virtualization will haunt customers, security experts 2008 onwards

We all know it. we are really not ready for security. C'mon, you should not be lying to yourself. You made the board happy by consolidating and saving your neck for a couple of years or months, depending your situation and the threat from your board.

Virtualization vendors are happy selling their stuff on the street and impressing their investors with some cool figures. System admins are happy to learn a new technology, they are just happy doing that, they've been waiting too long for some cool technologies. But now this technology has to be deployed in corporate world and serious applications like banking, insurance etc have to run on virtual platforms.

How do you combat security? What is/was their plan to ensure that the operations securely?

Telefici said that as information security improves, attackers' attention shifts to more vulnerable targets.

"After a pretty level playing field for some years, in 2007 we saw a big increase in social engineering to facilitate attacks, more precisely targeted attacks and more secretive attacks, as well as a change in motive from fame to fortune," he said.

Telefici said Microsoft had done a lot to improve the security of its products, but attackers are adapting their targets and methods to maintain their risk-reward ratio. Attackers were turning away from usual targets such as PayPal and eBay to smaller, less sophisticated targets that were easier to subvert.

"The criminals are driven by the risk-reward ratio," he said, "so these changes actually reflect the success of the industry in producing more effective products plus users' greater awareness of what not to do."


Link

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus

Splunk that!

Saw this advert on Slashdot and went on to look for it and found the tour pretty neat to look at. Check out the demo too! So why would I need it? WHY NOT? I'd say. As an organization grows , new services, new data comes by, new logs start accumulating on the servers and it becomes increasingly difficult to look at all those logs, leave alone that you'd have time to read them and who cares about analysis as the time to look for those log files already makes your day, isn't it? Well a solution like this is a cool option to have your sysadmins/operators look at ONE PLACE and thus you don't have your administrators lurking around in your physical servers and *accidentally* messing up things there. Go ahead and give it a shot by downloading it and testing it. I'll give it a shot myself! Ok so I went ahead and installed it. Do this... [root@tarrydev Software]# ./splunk-Server-1.0.1-linux-installer.bin to install and this (if you screw up) [root@tarrydev Software]# /op

Virtualization is hot and sexy!

If this does not convince you to virtualize, believe me, nothing will :-) As you will hear these gorgeous women mention VMware, Akkori, Pano Logic, Microsoft and VKernel. They forgot to mention rackspace ;-) virtualization girl video I'm convinced, aren't you? Check out their site as well!