Skip to main content

Is Oracle's virtualization call all fluff 'n bluff?

Well, according to ZDnet, the Analysts think so:

Oracle on Monday announced its own server virtualization software and claimed it was three times more efficient than rival products. VMware shares were whacked on the news. What a difference a day makes. On Tuesday, analysts called Oracle’s virtualization announcement “virtual FUD” and noted it was reminiscent to the company’s Unbreakable Linux announcement a year ago.

As Dan Farber detailed, Oracle’s own version of the Xen hypervisor seemed to be targeted at Red Hat, but impacted a bunch of other companies such as VMware and Citrix, which recently bought Xensource. In the big picture, the hypervisor writing is on the wall: It’ll be a commodity.Meanwhile, a lot of companies, HP, Microsoft, Oracle, Red Hat and Virtual Iron, are gunning for VMware.


We all need a partner, that can really give Xen some real introduction in the open source world, that way Virtual Iron is doing a lot better job at it. Sun, too will do better, and in my opinion, Sun will succeed in bringing open source virtualization to that "inflection point" eventually.

Link


and BTW, VMware is back on track, rising to 90+ already today!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus

Splunk that!

Saw this advert on Slashdot and went on to look for it and found the tour pretty neat to look at. Check out the demo too! So why would I need it? WHY NOT? I'd say. As an organization grows , new services, new data comes by, new logs start accumulating on the servers and it becomes increasingly difficult to look at all those logs, leave alone that you'd have time to read them and who cares about analysis as the time to look for those log files already makes your day, isn't it? Well a solution like this is a cool option to have your sysadmins/operators look at ONE PLACE and thus you don't have your administrators lurking around in your physical servers and *accidentally* messing up things there. Go ahead and give it a shot by downloading it and testing it. I'll give it a shot myself! Ok so I went ahead and installed it. Do this... [root@tarrydev Software]# ./splunk-Server-1.0.1-linux-installer.bin to install and this (if you screw up) [root@tarrydev Software]# /op

Virtualization is hot and sexy!

If this does not convince you to virtualize, believe me, nothing will :-) As you will hear these gorgeous women mention VMware, Akkori, Pano Logic, Microsoft and VKernel. They forgot to mention rackspace ;-) virtualization girl video I'm convinced, aren't you? Check out their site as well!