Skip to main content

Xiotech announces several new storage virtualization customers


Xiotech Corporation today announced several new customers have purchased Xiotech® Magnitude 3D® 3000 and Magnitude® 750 storage systems during the second quarter of 2007. New customers include Alaska Railroad Corporation, ISD (Independent School District) 15 – St. Francis (Minn.), The Minnesota Medical Foundation at the University of Minnesota, University of Florida Jacksonville Physicians, Inc., Saint Paul College and Wright County (Minn.).

The new contracts reinforce the appeal of the Magnitude virtualized platform for midsized organizations that are looking for a simple-to-manage storage system that can easily accommodate future growth.

Minnesota's Saint Paul College selected Magnitude 3D 3000e to support its VMware server virtualization initiative, migrating existing servers from a direct-attached storage environment to a virtualized storage area network (SAN) infrastructure. The college plans to reduce its server count from 30 to 10, with production and Exchange servers booting from the SAN.

"“Transitioning our data center to a virtualized environment was a strategic move for Saint Paul College," said Najam Saeed, CIO at St. Paul College. "The Xiotech system’s boot from SAN capabilities, storage virtualization, and VMware certifications were strong complements to our overall virtualization initiative."


Press Release

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...