Skip to main content

VMware dismisses partner lockout claim

XenSource said:

The virtualization spat began as XenSource announced its OEM agreement with Symantec last month when Simon Crosby, XenSource founder and chief technology officer, claimed that potential VMware partners were being put off by the breadth and depth of VMware's products.

"VMware is the runaway success story right now," he said, adding that VMware's success was causing concern among some of the larger software vendors as customers buying into VMware's VI3 get the ESX Server virtualization software, as well as VirtualCenter for virtual machine management, high availability, and resource scheduling, as well as consolidated backup capabilities.


Reza, Director Marketing, replies:

VMware's Reza Malekzadeh has denied the claim, however, insisting that there is a growing ecosystem of VMware partners and licensees. We have a firm commitment to working to open standards such as the DMTF [distributed management task force]," he said, while noting that the company's virtual machine disk format specification is openly available.

He also noted that Symantec is already a VMware partner, alongside other back-up software providers including CA, CommVault, EMC, IBM Tivoli, and Vizioncore. Indeed, Malekzadeh doubted the wisdom of XenSource picking such a close storage partner.


Check out the rest.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus

Splunk that!

Saw this advert on Slashdot and went on to look for it and found the tour pretty neat to look at. Check out the demo too! So why would I need it? WHY NOT? I'd say. As an organization grows , new services, new data comes by, new logs start accumulating on the servers and it becomes increasingly difficult to look at all those logs, leave alone that you'd have time to read them and who cares about analysis as the time to look for those log files already makes your day, isn't it? Well a solution like this is a cool option to have your sysadmins/operators look at ONE PLACE and thus you don't have your administrators lurking around in your physical servers and *accidentally* messing up things there. Go ahead and give it a shot by downloading it and testing it. I'll give it a shot myself! Ok so I went ahead and installed it. Do this... [root@tarrydev Software]# ./splunk-Server-1.0.1-linux-installer.bin to install and this (if you screw up) [root@tarrydev Software]# /op

Virtualization is hot and sexy!

If this does not convince you to virtualize, believe me, nothing will :-) As you will hear these gorgeous women mention VMware, Akkori, Pano Logic, Microsoft and VKernel. They forgot to mention rackspace ;-) virtualization girl video I'm convinced, aren't you? Check out their site as well!