Skip to main content

Economist: Use virtualization to dodge security issues

A better idea is to adopt something called virtualisation—a technique that’s been around for ages, but has only lately come back into fashion. Virtualisation provides a way of hiding a computer’s resources—its central processor, operating system, internal memory, network controller, and storage devices—behind a software curtain. The idea is to give users (not to mention nefarious strangers) the impression they have control of the machine, when really they are dealing with a simulacrum created entirely in software.

The technique was invented by IBM back in the 1960s, when software was relatively cheap and hardware incredibly expensive. By using virtualisation, one costly mainframe could be partitioned so as to run many different applications all at the same time—each within its own “virtual machine” in a layer of software running on top of the physical machine’s actual operating system.

With modern hardware so cheap, Intel-based servers that dish out applications and data have proliferated like rabbits. In most cases, only 10% to 15% of their resources are actually used. VMware, a company based in Palo Alto, California, was founded in the late 1990s to capitalise on this waste of resources. Helping companies get the most out of their hardware has made VMware one of the fastest growing software firms in decades.


Link
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus
Post a Comment
Read more

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...
Post a Comment
Read more