Skip to main content

Dell challenges virtualization "Myths"

Virtualization, which lets IT managers cram multiple computing environments onto one computer so that one physical server can perform the function of two or more machines, saves time, space, energy and money.

But getting an organization's datacenter to the point where it can start realizing all that's promised by virtualization isn't as easy as it could or should be, according to Glenn Keels, a senior project manager in Dell's PowerEdge server division.

"The industry, including Dell to a certain degree, is making consolidation and virtualization too complex," Keels told "There are some myths and misconceptions out there that are confusing customers. We've had customers coming to us asking if it's true that you need blades to virtualize."

Keels said Dell doesn't think it's in customers' best interests to be automatically steered to blade servers as part of their consolidation and virtualization efforts, even though they do take up considerably less physical space and consume less energy in the datacenter.

"We don't want to drive virtualization into proprietary systems," he said. "The customers receive the best price and performance by focusing on two- and four-socket systems. Let's not just blade everything. By whole-heartedly adopting that, you can actually increase complexity. Blades should be an option—and we love blades—but not a mandate."



  1. Terry,

    I tend to agree that management of virtualized environments is a serious challenge that is yet to be fully addressed in a complete, coherent fashion.

    I know of many interesting projects that have goals to offer a complete management environment for virtualized resources. None of them completely resolves the challenges.

  2. I tend to agree that management is one of the most serious inhibitors to the full adoption of virtual environments.

    I know of many projects to produce technology that will find virtual resources, provision them as needed, destroy them when needed and move them as needed. These solutions often do not really address the complete needs to manage all of the physical resources as well as the virtual ones.

  3. Dan,

    I must agree with you there that the management of virtualized environments can become a unmanageable chaos, should the business requirements not be addressed adequately. I know, it is easier said than done. A sales consultant sells the product, implementation consultant implements it and eventually you leave.

    It remains a serious challenge, no wonder a research shows that the consulting revenues will continue to rise, simply because data centers might be rendered unmanageable, if not completely secured.

    I think Change Management, CMDB, ITIL, SLAs and Account management will all need to be taken into account when managing virtualized environments. Whether its a sandbox or development environments or on-demand virtual Labs (for company trainings, etc), all must be accounted for. Resource allocation too must be managed within virtual environments, after all the computing resources four-cores (cpu,memory,disk and network)are only limited.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DeepLearningTrucker Part 1

Avastu Blog is migrating to; 1st Jan 2009 live


I will send out emails personally to those who are using my link(s) on their sites.

Thanks much for your co-operation and hope you enjoy the new site and its cool new features :-)

Not like the site is unlive or something..on the contrary, its beginning to get a lot of attention already. Well most of the work is done, you don't have to worry about anything though:

What won't change

Links/Referrals: I will be redirecting the links (all links which you may have cross-posted) to - so you don't have to do anything in all your posts and links. Although, I would urge however that you do change the permalinks, especially on your blogs etc yourselfThis blog is not going away anywhere but within a few months, I will consider discontinuing its usage. I won't obviously do …

Cloud Security: Eliminate humans from the "Information Supply Chain on the Web"

My upcoming article, part - 3 data center predictions for 2009, has a slideshot talking about the transition from the current age to the cloud computing age to eventually the ideation age- the age where you will have clouds that will emote but they will have no internal employees.

Biggest management disasters occur because internal folks are making a mess of the playground.

Om's blog is carrying an article about Cloud security and it is rather direct but also makes a lot of sense:

I don’t believe that clouds themselves will cause the security breaches and data theft they anticipate; in many ways, clouds will result in better security. Here’s why: Fewer humans –Most computer breaches are the result of human error; only 20-40 percent stem from technical malfunctions. Cloud operators that want to be profitable take humans out of the loop whenever possible.Better tools – Clouds can afford high-end data protection and security monitoring tools, as well as the experts to run them. I trust…