Skip to main content

XenSource gets website help from Resolute

The cutting-edge XenSource website reduces maintenance costs and saves time by enabling content to be updated, edited and approved quickly with centralized collaboration and workflows for its distributed teams. Running on the Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 platform provides the added advantage of feature-rich functionality so that blogs, wikis and other functions can be used immediately or turned on when needed.

XenSource selected Resolute because of their technical depth and agility. Roger Klorese, XenSource senior director of product and solutions marketing explained, “The entire team at Resolute were responsive, flexible and delivered a world-class site quickly and on budget, and helped us to leverage our investments in Microsoft and SharePoint.”

Why did they choose SharePoint, aren't there enough of those CMS solutions like Joomla etc? Just wondering... Here's the link.

Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousThu Aug 30, 08:45:00 AM GMT+2

    It had a lot more to do with choosing the developer group and going with their skills than the other way around.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus
Post a Comment
Read more

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...
Post a Comment
Read more