Skip to main content

VMware and GPL analysed

Very interesting perspective

Furthermore, VMware’s use of Linux is hardly a secret that’s just been uncovered—as the usual corporation-hating online mob crying “scandal!” seems to be implying. The architecture of ESX Server has been known for years. Books have been written about it. Therefore, it’s hard for me to believe that any potential issue here hasn’t been thoroughly researched and discussed by people familiar with both the technical and the legal details. Certainly there have been cases where GPL violations buried deep in some network device’s firmware have only come to light belatedly. But that’s not the case here. VMware has never exactly trumpeted the fact that it leverages Linux. But it’s well documented. That something like this was sitting in plain sight for years and that even competitors (such as the various Xen proponents) never raised a public peep certainly suggests that there’s not much to raise a peep about.


Read it. I won´t be surprised if this perspective gets slashdotted.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus
Post a Comment
Read more

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...
Post a Comment
Read more