Skip to main content

Impact of HBA performance with Server Virtualization




Introduction of 64-bit, multi-core processors, PCI Express host bus and improved memory architectures have greatly benefited server consolidation and its rapid adoption in the virtualized datacenter. In the storage networking space, the evolution of consolidated server deployments and the move to 4Gb Fibre Channel switches and storage arrays is demanding a need for higher scalability in server connectivity to storage. To meet these ever-growing demands in consolidated and virtualized environments, it is imperative that enterprise IT managers deploy a scalable, high performance HBA architecture; an HBA architecture that can address the demands placed by multiple virtual machines (VMs) or guest OSes, and applications in virtualized environments running simultaneously on a single physical server.


Go get this whitepaper from Qlogic.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...