Skip to main content

Xensource Webcast and Global 20-city seminars


Xensource is on a solid track with Forrester backing :-)

In this webcast, Frank Gillett, Vice President at Forrester, will discuss what the server virtualization hype is all about, how the recent technology evolution is affecting the way companies can leverage virtualization for server consolidation, and recommendations on how to get started now.

Frank conducts research on strategic issues in enterprise IT infrastructure. Current topics include next-generation data center architectures and related business strategies, including terms like utility computing, grid computing, on-demand eBusiness, adaptive enterprise and dynamic systems.


Where all?

March 22 - London, U.K.
March 28 - Birmingham, U.K.
April 17 - Wellington, New Zealand
April 18 - Munich, Germany
April 19 - Frankfurt, Germany
April 19 - Sydney, Australia
April 19 - New York, U.S.
April 20 - Washington D.C., U.S.
April 24 - Atlanta, U.S.

April 25 - Chicago, U.S.
April 26 - Dallas, U.S.
April 26 - Paris, France
April 27 - Amsterdam, Netherlands
May 4 - Milan, Italy
May 9 - Madrid, Spain
May 8 - San Francisco, U.S.
May 10 - London, U.K

Register

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...