Skip to main content

Virtualization: Solaris Containers are better?

Paul from ZDnet has some reasons to say why one ought to choose Solaris against other solutions.

Part of the issue here is that the popularity of PC style virtualization responds to issues the Unix community has never had - the pretend professionalism implicit in copying data processing's commitment to partitioning, and the nineties NT manager's learned aversion to trusting NT with more than one application at a time.

Notice that both of these illustrate what happens when people refuse to adapt as reality changes - the cost and memory management issues that drove partitioning and VM in the 1960s were history by the late seventies, and today's Windows servers can easily handle a number of concurrent applications provided that the load process leaves the registery in a consistent state and no more than one hacks it during operations.

Obviously there are some commets that beg to disagree. I liked the one by toadlife

"because you need to pay for the VM licensing and support, and indirectly because the OS/Applications licenses you need to run on the larger memory or multi-processor models most people select as virtualization hosts usually cost more;"

Wrong. VMware ESX does not cost *that* much money, and in the vast majority of cases, the hosts do not require more virtual processors and memory than their physical counterparts. Furthermore, most servers sit around all day doing absolutely nothing, and times when every server needs processor time are rare, unless your setup is unusual. It also shares common memory pages between hosts, so if you are running five copies of Win2k3 on on physical machine, and they all have the same ntoskernel.exe, that kernel will only be loaded once into memory of the physical machine. The result is that a typical Windows server will only take up around 20-50MB of unique memory from the physical server.

Check out toadlife's full response.

I know, I know. Thread virtualization, network is the computer, multi-core processors, cored-threads, X-cores. KVM. openVZ. I'm sure a lot of people are already cringing as they clutch on to their wallets even harder!

Bottom Line: There are a lot of reasons for customers to choose ESX Servers. There are a lot of reasons to experiment a lot of other things in the labs. How a technology like ESX got to the production? Well ask all those customers!


Popular posts from this blog

DeepLearningTrucker Part 1

Avastu Blog is migrating to; 1st Jan 2009 live


I will send out emails personally to those who are using my link(s) on their sites.

Thanks much for your co-operation and hope you enjoy the new site and its cool new features :-)

Not like the site is unlive or something..on the contrary, its beginning to get a lot of attention already. Well most of the work is done, you don't have to worry about anything though:

What won't change

Links/Referrals: I will be redirecting the links (all links which you may have cross-posted) to - so you don't have to do anything in all your posts and links. Although, I would urge however that you do change the permalinks, especially on your blogs etc yourselfThis blog is not going away anywhere but within a few months, I will consider discontinuing its usage. I won't obviously do …

Cloud Security: Eliminate humans from the "Information Supply Chain on the Web"

My upcoming article, part - 3 data center predictions for 2009, has a slideshot talking about the transition from the current age to the cloud computing age to eventually the ideation age- the age where you will have clouds that will emote but they will have no internal employees.

Biggest management disasters occur because internal folks are making a mess of the playground.

Om's blog is carrying an article about Cloud security and it is rather direct but also makes a lot of sense:

I don’t believe that clouds themselves will cause the security breaches and data theft they anticipate; in many ways, clouds will result in better security. Here’s why: Fewer humans –Most computer breaches are the result of human error; only 20-40 percent stem from technical malfunctions. Cloud operators that want to be profitable take humans out of the loop whenever possible.Better tools – Clouds can afford high-end data protection and security monitoring tools, as well as the experts to run them. I trust…