Skip to main content

Virtualization: Are you willing to pay the price?



Time for some plain and simple facts. And this discussion I had with a leading education supplier in the Netherlands this morning. Yes this morning!

We were talking about the pricing against the price you're willing to pay. So is ESX really that expensive? Ask yourself these questions and decide yourself:

  • Am I willing to pay the price for a virtualization solution that just about might help me save money in the future?
  • Am I willing to invest in another virtualization vendor and its solutions while ignoring the "screaming message across the wall?"*
  • What about manageability? Are we getting the real win out of the virtualization solution?
  • Benchmarks: Is the cheaper solution the best or should I wait and see and risk my services go from bad (current physical) to worse (unmeasurable choices made due to pressure on costs)

Having said this, I don't want to target any virtualization vendor or solution. All I say is :
  • Do the math
  • Benchmark
  • Ask around
  • Do the math (again)


So this article obviously takes a jab at VMware's pricing and sure some folks might welcome it too. But are we forgetting something here? Its the technology and not a particular vendor. With loads of virtualization solutions springing like mushrooms all over this marshland, what do you do?
In 2006, many enterprise IT groups saw the potential in virtualization, rushed to consolidate servers and subsequently propelled VMware software to a market-leading spot. As 2007 begins, VMware’s prices are under attack, just as more CIOs look to virtualization to control server and storage sprawl and tame data center power costs.


What do you do?

Analysts advise CIOs planning for virtualization in 2007 to think strategically, not just tactically.


Ditto!

Read further...

*PS: And I didn't mention it in the same tone as the famed (or infamous) quote "Writing on the wall"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...