Skip to main content

XenSource Acquisition: Novell to play spark the hyperdisrutive game?

Linux-Mag reports about speculations of Novell will end up buying XenSource and Altiris.I think acquisition is only a small part of the hyper-disruptive year that 2007 has been touted to be. Microsoft's rather controversial entry into the open source game will surely prompt Novell to take some action to start doing some work on it to finally get something out of that "blood in the water".

If Microsoft has a patent covering Xen-like virtualization tucked away somewhere in their intellectual property vault then Novell could use that to plant doubt in customers minds about upgrading to RHEL 5.

Novell paid handsomely for that patent indemnification -- both in cash and community PR -- you have to assume they're going to put it to use and acquiring XenSource would put them in a position to leverage it.

Redhat's sales are not daunted by Oracle's own Enterprise Linux's announcement. Neither is Novell gaining much ground. Sometimes Novell tends to look a lot like Sun. They have good products but just can't sell well.

XenSource's acquisition might have some value to Novell's suite but I think it is still too early to say if it will be a profitable one. I could be merely a speculation, to spark off the scare so others start looking at XenSource OR maybe people want to look at XenSource again since it lost a bit of steam (I mean marketing steam) at the expense of other upcoming virtualization vendors like Virtual Iron et al. It should make "strategic sense" and not merely "geographic sense" as Matt Assay put it in InfoWorld.

Honestly I am worried about Novell's future. They have taken up a some bold move when they moved in with Microsoft. But still I don't know. Is it a mercy buying (although still in speculative phase which might never materialize for all we know) or plain strategic intent? We don't know. But I don't think this acquisition will affect VMware or Citrix in any way.

So in the end not really a hyperdisruptive move(if taken). And what about the user/client community, do they really care?


Popular posts from this blog

DeepLearningTrucker Part 1

Avastu Blog is migrating to; 1st Jan 2009 live


I will send out emails personally to those who are using my link(s) on their sites.

Thanks much for your co-operation and hope you enjoy the new site and its cool new features :-)

Not like the site is unlive or something..on the contrary, its beginning to get a lot of attention already. Well most of the work is done, you don't have to worry about anything though:

What won't change

Links/Referrals: I will be redirecting the links (all links which you may have cross-posted) to - so you don't have to do anything in all your posts and links. Although, I would urge however that you do change the permalinks, especially on your blogs etc yourselfThis blog is not going away anywhere but within a few months, I will consider discontinuing its usage. I won't obviously do …

Cloud Security: Eliminate humans from the "Information Supply Chain on the Web"

My upcoming article, part - 3 data center predictions for 2009, has a slideshot talking about the transition from the current age to the cloud computing age to eventually the ideation age- the age where you will have clouds that will emote but they will have no internal employees.

Biggest management disasters occur because internal folks are making a mess of the playground.

Om's blog is carrying an article about Cloud security and it is rather direct but also makes a lot of sense:

I don’t believe that clouds themselves will cause the security breaches and data theft they anticipate; in many ways, clouds will result in better security. Here’s why: Fewer humans –Most computer breaches are the result of human error; only 20-40 percent stem from technical malfunctions. Cloud operators that want to be profitable take humans out of the loop whenever possible.Better tools – Clouds can afford high-end data protection and security monitoring tools, as well as the experts to run them. I trust…