Skip to main content

Strategy Sessions: VMware vs Low Cost Rivals!



  • Parallels challenging and luring VMware into the dark alleys.
  • XenSource doing a cosmetic upgrade to attract Windows clients
  • Virtual Iron comparing its pricing (80%* cheaper than VMware they say) against VMware
  • Microsoft keeping mum (I'm sure Russinovich is up to something there, we'll know pretty soon for sure) but sure working on something
  • SWsoft wooing Sun and integrating openVZ on their Servers.
VMware needs to take a deep breath and think of a strategy to spin off catalytic innovations (and I mean on their Business Model as well) with inside-outs and outside-ins insights.Watch this space. I will finish post by tonite!

Thanks to David (in comment) for the correction!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus
Post a Comment
Read more

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...
Post a Comment
Read more