Skip to main content

Want to work for Google?



OK then get prepared for some Aptitude Tests.

o Pure Math Oriented Test

o How does the Form look like? Well look here then.

o Lot's of Marketing and Sales job here at home, and in Switzerland Mobile and Wireless Developer Jobs .

Comments

  1. Are you applying? :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Heh Heh...

    I think first I'll threaten MicroSoft that I'm planning to join Google. They'll sue me, I'll get publicity, then I'll cut a deal with Google.

    But seriously If they're looking for someone who's into
    -- Virtualization(VMWare in mind)
    -- Linux Clustering
    -- Linux Load Balancing
    -- Db's(Oracle, SQL Server, MySQL)
    -- Java(A beginner tho here)
    -- Terminal Services (Keeping LTSP in mind)
    -- Client Desktop Management/Deployment

    etc etc then WHY NOT? :-)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...