Skip to main content

A Collection of Threnodies: Part 2


Suiphilomaniacal Me!
----------------------------------

I'm on the edge of loving me
I'm on the verge on falling in love
I'm given to me
Adulation coated like gum on me

Wanting you to want me
wanting me want you want me
I'm in trance, I'm dissolved
I'm floored, I'm absolved

I'm the furnace, the charred cauldron
I'm the supernova, the solar flare
I'm that burning star, that rock
I'm gleeful, I race with the gods!

I'm gunning to go, from here to here
I displace myself, I misplace myself
I'm the shrewd, the sage, the enraged
I'd do you, just because I've (once) loved you

Perspicacious me, I gloat at thee
King acute,I'm the techno alighieri
Ok so I've sinned, haven't you?
Ok so I ducked, so should you

I've loose ends I forgot to tie up
You've got ends I could make help meet
I'm in the wilderness,dilapidation...
my ruins are my treasures for keeps

Watch me, watch me
watching you watching me watch you
So is the sky deep enough to fall into?
let's ungravitate, let's fall out

Hear me, Hear me
Hearing you hear me hear you
It sure is gonna be a while
till I fall in love with me(all over again)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus
Post a Comment
Read more

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...
Post a Comment
Read more