Skip to main content

Cloud Computing Event in Hyderabad: Asian market is ripe!


Here'e the program:

Emerging paradigms for software products/solutions

August 23, 2008, 10am, @ Google, Hyderabad

Experts from Hyderabad, Bangalore, and US will share their perspectives and experiences with Virtualization, SaaS and PaaS. Sessions will include cloud evolution, infrastructure & tools, design patterns and case studies.

Cloud Evolution
An overview of SaaS Infrastructure, Platforms, applications and
tools options.

Infrastructure & tools
An introduction to infrastructures on which cloud computing runs:
Google Application Engine, Process Factory, and Microsoft Live Mesh.

Design Patterns
An introduction to frameworks which provide tools to create and deploy applications: SQL abstraction on Web-based SaaS solutions.

Case Studies
A presentation on the business applications used for the personal or business productivity: Case Study on re-engineering a financial solution for SaaS.

Speakers: Jinesh Varia (Evangelist-Amazon(USA)), Prof.Vasudeva
Varma(IIIT-Hyderabad), and senior architects from Progress Software, Google, Cordys, Microsoft, Pramati,Infosys and 3i-Infotech.

Event Coordinator: Ramesh Loganathan, MD Progress Software.


Source, found it here first
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus
Post a Comment
Read more

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...
Post a Comment
Read more