Skip to main content

Europe Virtualization Conference schedule ready!

Raphael is working really hard to set up the stage and has the stuff ready.



I will be speaking at the Strategy day and will speak about: 11:00 deploying virtualisation in my company: choices, transitions, futur proof solutions (Correct me if I'm wrong, Raphael)

Anyways check out the list and they do have an impressive list of sponsors.

Wanna sponsor the event? It's very simple, check out the deal:

1000€ financial support gives:
- stand for the whole duration of the event (2 days)
- visibility on the website (left side column)
- short description on the website (see
http://www.profoss.eu/events/october-2007-asterisk/?tab=sponsors )
- same description in the folder distributed to participants
- flyer in the welcome pack given to each participant
- 1 A4 page about your company in our press release (see
http://www.profoss.eu/documents/Profoss-Asterisk-file_en.pdf )
- if possible, inclusion in all our communications and ads

Hurry as time is running out! Contact me on my gmail.com address!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus
Post a Comment
Read more

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...
Post a Comment
Read more