Skip to main content

Virtualization: Flexibility and Scalability is the new theme!



Look around you. Ask your colleaues of what they want. Look at the micro-managed desktop and server environemnt. Look at disgruntled clients/customers because their services/requests have to wait weeks and weeks to pass through that agonizing ITIL beast.. change manager needs to approve, activities need to be planned, test/development/staging environments have to be reinvented. Hang on, this conversation is something many of you can very well understand. You've gone through it! All of you (I know it!)





There is an acute need for flexibility, scalability will come. Scalability will come because you client/customer will want to continue to do business with you and you will discover new ways to provision and manage these ever increasing but highly manageable environments!

Anyways Arn Australia says the same things...

The next challenge is whether you need to run your own enterprise applications in-house. A few years ago software-as-a-service was experimental. Things have changed, and as the software-as-a-service vendors have become more sophisticated and the Internet infrastructure more robust, the value proposition has become undeniable. And now that inexpensive, fat data pipes are available, user-access performance is not much of an issue.


SaaS and Virtualization are getting mainstream. All over the place. Hype is long gone. Check out this article...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Security: VMware Workstation 6 vulnerability

vulnerable software: VMware Workstation 6.0 for Windows, possible some other VMware products as well type of vulnerability: DoS, potential privilege escalation I found a vulnerability in VMware Workstation 6.0 which allows an unprivileged user in the host OS to crash the system and potentially run arbitrary code with kernel privileges. The issue is in the vmstor-60 driver, which is supposed to mount VMware images within the host OS. When sending the IOCTL code FsSetVoleInformation with subcode FsSetFileInformation with a large buffer and underreporting its size to at max 1024 bytes, it will underrun and potentially execute arbitrary code. Security focus

OS Virtualization comparison: Parallels' Virtuozzo vs the rest

Virtuozzo's main differentiators versus hypervisors center on overhead, virtualization flexibility, administration and cost. Virtuozzo requires significantly less overhead than hypervisor solutions, generally in the range of 1% to 5% compared with 7% to 25% for most hypervisors, leaving more of the system available to run user workloads. Customers can also virtualize a wider range of applications using Virtuozzo, including transactional databases, which often suffer from performance problems when used with hypervisors. On the administration side, customers need to manage, maintain and secure just a single OS instance, while the hypervisor model requires customers to manage many OS instances. Of course, the hypervisor vendors have worked hard to automate much of this process, but it still requires more effort to manage and maintain multiple operating systems than a single instance. Finally, OS virtualization with Virtuozzo has a lower list price than the leading hypervisor for comme...